In re Sher

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Sher

830 A.2d 1262, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 538, 2003 WL 22019774

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 28, 2003

DocketNo. 03-BG-841

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 830 A.2d 1262 (In re Sher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sher, 830 A.2d 1262, 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 538, 2003 WL 22019774 (D.C. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the affidavit of Neal M. Sher, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the [1263]*1263Board on Professional Responsibility with respect thereto, it is this 28th day of August, 2003,

ORDERED that the said Neal M. Sher is hereby disbarred by consent effective forthwith. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment should run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI