In re Shemeco D.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shemeco D.

265 A.D.2d 860, 695 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9942

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by14 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 860 (In re Shemeco D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shemeco D., 265 A.D.2d 860, 695 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondent failed to appear in court on the scheduled day for a fact-finding hearing on a neglect petition, and Family Court granted a default order finding that respondent’s three children were neglected. We reverse. “Respondent[‘s] failure to appear in person at the scheduled fact-finding hearing does not automatically constitute a default [citations omitted]. This is especially true where, as here, respondent! ] did appear by [his] assigned counsel who objected to petitioner’s default motion and who, given the opportunity, could have proceeded to a hearing and defended [her] absent client!]” (Matter of Cassandra M., 260 AD2d 961, 962-963; see, Matter of Baer, 125 Misc 2d 563, 569; Besharov, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, Family Ct Act § 1042, at 119). The court should have conducted a fact-finding hearing and made a determination based on the facts and evidence presented to the court (see, Matter of Cassandra M., supra). In the absence of a fact-finding hearing, there was no factual support for the finding that the children were neglected. We reject [861]*861petitioner’s contention that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon default. Because counsel for respondent appeared on the day of the scheduled fact-finding hearing, the order was not one entered upon respondent’s default (see, Matter of Kwasi S., 221 AD2d 1029). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Erie County Family Court to conduct a fact-finding hearing on the petition. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J. — Neglect.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Erie County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Respondent failed to appear in court on the scheduled day for a fact-finding hearing on a neglect petition, and Family Court granted a default order finding that respondent’s three children were neglected. We reverse. “Respondent[‘s] failure to appear in person at the scheduled fact-finding hearing does not automatically constitute a default [citations omitted]. This is especially true where, as here, respondent! ] did appear by [his] assigned counsel who objected to petitioner’s default motion and who, given the opportunity, could have proceeded to a hearing and defended [her] absent client!]” (Matter of Cassandra M., 260 AD2d 961, 962-963; see, Matter of Baer, 125 Misc 2d 563, 569; Besharov, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, Family Ct Act § 1042, at 119). The court should have conducted a fact-finding hearing and made a determination based on the facts and evidence presented to the court (see, Matter of Cassandra M., supra). In the absence of a fact-finding hearing, there was no factual support for the finding that the children were neglected. We reject [861]*861petitioner’s contention that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that no appeal lies from an order entered upon default. Because counsel for respondent appeared on the day of the scheduled fact-finding hearing, the order was not one entered upon respondent’s default (see, Matter of Kwasi S., 221 AD2d 1029). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Erie County Family Court to conduct a fact-finding hearing on the petition. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J. — Neglect.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 860, 695 N.Y.S.2d 799, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shemeco-d-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack