In re Shelton

274 So. 3d 1250
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 17, 2019
DocketNO. 2019-B-0791
StatusPublished

This text of 274 So. 3d 1250 (In re Shelton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Shelton, 274 So. 3d 1250 (La. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Respondent pleaded no contest to felony possession of a Schedule II CDS and no contest to first offense DWI. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent violated Rules 8.4(a) and 8.4(b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Matthew Vance Shelton, Louisiana Bar Roll number 34349, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years. It is further ordered that all but six months of the suspension shall be deferred. Following the active portion of the suspension, respondent shall be subject to a period of probation to coincide with the remaining term of his monitoring agreement with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred portion of the suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance *1251with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 So. 3d 1250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shelton-la-2019.