in Re Shelly Lanum
This text of in Re Shelly Lanum (in Re Shelly Lanum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 14, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-12-00502-CV
IN RE SHELLY LANUM, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 315th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-07959J
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 31, 2012, relator Shelly Lanum,1 the mother of J.W.B., a child, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Michael H. Schneider, presiding judge of the 315th District Court of Harris
1 Relator styled her petition, “In re J.W.B.” The real party in interest argues that relator does not have standing to bring this proceeding on behalf of the child. In a petition for writ of mandamus, however, the party seeking relief is the relator. Tex. R. App. P. 52.2. The proper style, therefore, is In re Shelly Lanum. County to vacate temporary orders granting sole managing conservatorship of J.W.B. to the Department of Family and Protective Services.
Relator has failed to establish entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Jamison, and McCally.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Shelly Lanum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shelly-lanum-texapp-2012.