In re Sheldon D.G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sheldon D.G.

6 A.D.3d 613, 774 N.Y.S.2d 819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 A.D.3d 613 (In re Sheldon D.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sheldon D.G., 6 A.D.3d 613, 774 N.Y.S.2d 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

— In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated January 23, 2002, which denied her motion, inter alia, for supervised disclosure.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order of the Family Court in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights based on permanent neglect, in contrast to a nondispositional order in a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10 (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Roy D., Jr., 207 AD2d 958 [1994]). We decline to grant leave to appeal. In any event, we note that there is no merit to the contentions raised by the appellant. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated January 23, 2002, which denied her motion, inter alia, for supervised disclosure.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies as of right from a nondispositional order of the Family Court in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights based on permanent neglect, in contrast to a nondispositional order in a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10 (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Roy D., Jr., 207 AD2d 958 [1994]). We decline to grant leave to appeal. In any event, we note that there is no merit to the contentions raised by the appellant. Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 613, 774 N.Y.S.2d 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sheldon-dg-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack