in Re Shayna (Deboise) Herring

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 9, 2015
Docket01-14-00989-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Shayna (Deboise) Herring (in Re Shayna (Deboise) Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Shayna (Deboise) Herring, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

ACCEPTED 01-14-00989-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/9/2015 11:30:41 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK

CASE NO: 01-14-00989-CV

IN THEFIRST COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS AT HOUSTON HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/9/2015 11:30:41 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk IN RE SHAYNA (DEBOISE) HERRING

Relator

From the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

REAL PARTY IN INTEREST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS:

Real Party in Interest’s Counsel respectfully requests that the Court grant this Motion for

Extension of Time established by Rule 10.5 and Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure.

I.

Real Party in Interest’s deadline for filing their Reply is January 31, 2015. Real Party in

Interest respectfully requests an extension of time to file their brief for an additional thirty (30)

days pursuant to Rule 10.5 and Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

II.

Real Party in Interests received the Notice of Reply on or around December 29, 2014.

Further, Relator has not been taken into the custody of the Harris County Sheriff’s Department and is not currently incarcerated. Therefore, the urgency to have this matter heard by Relator is

somewhat diminished as she is not incarcerated. Real Party in Interest requests this Court to

extend the reply deadline. This request is unopposed.

III.

There has been no extensions granted to extend the time to file Real Party in Interest’s

Reply.

IV.

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5) Real Party in Interest’s

counsel contacted Relator’s counsel and Relator’s counsel was not opposed to this motion.

V. CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, Real Party in Interest respectfully requests that this Motion

for Extension of Time be granted so that Real Party in Interest has an adequate opportunity to

respond to the Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Respectfully Submitted,

THE LAW OFFICE OF TERISA TAYLOR, P.C. 917 Franklin Street, Suite 510 Houston, Texas 77002 Tel: (713) 224-9900 Fax: (713) 224-9903

By:______________________________________ TERISA TAYLOR SBN: 24000240 GRACE M. CRUMP SBN: 24083482 Attorneys for CASTON LEE DEBOISE CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

As required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certify that on January 9, 2015, I have conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with all other parties – which are listed below – about the merits of this motion and George Dana does not oppose this Motion.

____________________________________ TERISA TAYLOR GRACE M. CRUMP

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5(d), (e), this is to certify that a copy of this motion was served on Shayna (DeBoise) Herring, by and through her attorney of record, George Dana on January 9, 2015, by faxing a copy to George Dana at (281) 484-9687 and by efiling in the 247th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.

____________________________________ TERISA TAYLOR GRACE M. CRUMP

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Shayna (Deboise) Herring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shayna-deboise-herring-texapp-2015.