In re Shaw
This text of 669 F. App'x 187 (In re Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jeffrey Cantrell Shaw petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to recall and reconsider the court’s prior order denying Shaw’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shaw-ca4-2016.