In re Shatina L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shatina L.

226 A.D.2d 1069, 642 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5531

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1996·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the petitions terminating the parental rights of respondent based upon his permanent neglect of his three daughters. Despite petitioner’s efforts over a three-year period to help respondent to plan for his children’s future, respondent continually failed to do so (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136; Matter of Tanya P., 219 AD2d 849). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J.— Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the petitions terminating the parental rights of respondent based upon his permanent neglect of his three daughters. Despite petitioner’s efforts over a three-year period to help respondent to plan for his children’s future, respondent continually failed to do so (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136; Matter of Tanya P., 219 AD2d 849). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J.— Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

In re Shatina L., 226 A.D.2d 1069, 642 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

226 A.D.2d 1069 (In re Shatina L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related