in Re: Sharyland Water Supply Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 14, 2006
Docket13-06-00683-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Sharyland Water Supply Corporation (in Re: Sharyland Water Supply Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Sharyland Water Supply Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion





NUMBERS 13-06-676-CV

13-06-683-CV



COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________________

IN RE: SHARYLAND WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION

____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

_____________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



On December 8, 2006, in appellate cause number 13-06-676-CV, relator Sharyland Water Supply Corporation filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which it requested this Court to direct the Respondent, the Honorable Horacio Pena, Jr., presiding judge of the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, to vacate his December 5, 2006 "Order Setting Trials" in trial court cause number C-1373-01-A in the 92nd District Court. Also on December 8, 2006, relator filed an "agreed" emergency motion, requesting a stay of "further proceedings" in cause number C-1373-01-A.

On December 12, 2006, in appellate cause number 13-06-683-CV, relator Sharyland Water Corporation filed a second petition for writ of mandamus, in which it requested this Court to direct the Respondent, the Honorable Migdalia Lopez, presiding judge of the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, to vacate her December 12, 2006 order denying relator's Motion to Disqualify/Recuse the Honorable Horacio Pena, Jr. in trial court cause number C-1373-01-A. Relator also filed an "Emergency Motion for Stay," requesting a stay of "further proceedings" in trial court cause number C-1373-01-A.

The Court, having considered the petitions for writ of mandamus and requests for emergency relief in both causes and related documentation, is of the opinion that both petitions and requests for emergency relief should be denied.

Relator's petition for writ of mandamus and Motion for Stay in appellate cause number 13-06-676-CV are hereby denied. Relator's petition for writ of mandamus and Emergency Motion for Stay in appellate cause number 13-06-683-CV are hereby denied.

Per Curiam



Memorandum opinion delivered and filed

this the 14th day of December, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Sharyland Water Supply Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sharyland-water-supply-corporation-texapp-2006.