In re Sharpe

Fourth Circuit

In re Sharpe

625 F. App'x 207

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2015·No. No. 15-2303·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petitions denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

■ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for 'release pending appeal. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find ■ the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition and the amended ■ mandamus petition. ■ We dispense with oral ■ argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitions denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

■ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for 'release pending appeal. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find ■ the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition and the amended ■ mandamus petition. ■ We dispense with oral ■ argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED.

In re Sharpe, 625 F. App'x 207 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

625 F. App'x 207 (In re Sharpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related