In re Sharpe
This text of 625 F. App'x 207 (In re Sharpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitions denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
■ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jerry Wayne Sharpe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion for 'release pending appeal. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find ■ the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition and the amended ■ mandamus petition. ■ We dispense with oral ■ argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
625 F. App'x 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sharpe-ca4-2015.