In re Sharlese Danielle S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sharlese Danielle S.

294 A.D.2d 267, 741 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5662

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 28, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 294 A.D.2d 267 (In re Sharlese Danielle S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sharlese Danielle S., 294 A.D.2d 267, 741 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about April 16, 1999, insofar as appealed from, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the child, Sharlese Danielle S., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied respondent’s request for a suspended judgment based on a record showing that she failed to ameliorate the conditions that led to the child’s placement. Furthermore, the evidence is more than sufficient that the foster parent, with whom the child lived for most of her life, has met the child’s special needs and has provided her with a loving and caring home and family (see, Matter of Juan Andres R., 216 AD2d 145). Concur—Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Rosenberger, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about April 16, 1999, insofar as appealed from, terminating respondent’s parental rights to the child, Sharlese Danielle S., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied respondent’s request for a suspended judgment based on a record showing that she failed to ameliorate the conditions that led to the child’s placement. Furthermore, the evidence is more than sufficient that the foster parent, with whom the child lived for most of her life, has met the child’s special needs and has provided her with a loving and caring home and family (see, Matter of Juan Andres R., 216 AD2d 145). Concur—Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Rosenberger, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 A.D.2d 267, 741 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sharlese-danielle-s-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack