In re Shareema F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shareema F.

250 A.D.2d 416, 671 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 250 A.D.2d 416 (In re Shareema F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shareema F., 250 A.D.2d 416, 671 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about May 6, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her on intensive probationary supervision for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). There was ample evidence that appellant intentionally caused physical injury and caused the complainant to fear imminent serious physical injury. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about May 6, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree, and placed her on intensive probationary supervision for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). There was ample evidence that appellant intentionally caused physical injury and caused the complainant to fear imminent serious physical injury. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 A.D.2d 416, 671 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shareema-f-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack