In re Shapiro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Shapiro

896 A.2d 1160

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 27, 2006

DocketNo. 691 Disciplinary Docket No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 896 A.2d 1160 (In re Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shapiro, 896 A.2d 1160 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 7, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 7, 2005, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 A.2d 1160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shapiro-pa-2006.