In re Shapiro

253 A.D. 741, 300 N.Y.S. 774, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5419

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Suffolk county denying on the merits petitioner’s application for an order directing the com[742]*742mittee of an incompetent person to pay the petitioner's claim, or in the alternative, that the petitioner be permitted to sue said committee, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and permission to sue the committee is granted, without costs. Although the court was justified in refusing to direct payment of the petitioner’s claim, as her proofs established a prima fade ease she was entitled to an order permitting her to sue. (Grant v. Humbert, 114 App. Div. 462; Kent v. West, 33 id. 112.) Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Shapiro, 253 A.D. 741, 300 N.Y.S. 774, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

253 A.D. 741 (In re Shapiro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grant v. Humbert
114 A.D. 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)