In re Shapiro

105 A.3d 626, 220 N.J. 216, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 33
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 15, 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.3d 626 (In re Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Shapiro, 105 A.3d 626, 220 N.J. 216, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 33 (N.J. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 14-134, concluding that JOEL F. SHAPIRO of BOUND BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in [217]*2171988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 1.4(b) (failure to communicate with the client);

And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to submit proof of his fitness to practice law;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOEL F. SHAPIRO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that within sixty days after the filing date of this Order, respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethic proof of his fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.3d 626, 220 N.J. 216, 2015 N.J. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shapiro-nj-2015.