In re Shannon R.

278 A.D.2d 939, 718 N.Y.S.2d 677, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13571
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 939 (In re Shannon R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Shannon R., 278 A.D.2d 939, 718 N.Y.S.2d 677, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Appeal from order insofar as it concerns placement unanimously dismissed and order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating her a person in need of supervision and placing her in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services (Commissioner) for a period expiring on December 21, 2000. Respondent contends that placement with the Commissioner is not an appropriate disposition; that the order fails to comply with Family Court Act § 754 (2) because it does not state the rationale for the placement; and that Family Court failed to comply with Family Court Act § 741 (a) by advising her of her right to remain silent during the dispositional hearing. All of those contentions are moot because the placement order expired on December 21, 2000 (see, Matter of Jessica MM., 256 AD2d 1027, 1028; Matter of Alex N., 255 AD2d 626, 627; Matter of Kristie II., 252 AD2d 807, 808), and this matter does not fall within the exceptions to the mootness doctrine (cf., Matter of Kevin R., 251 AD2d 1022, 1023).

Finally, respondent contends that the court violated her right to a speedy disposition pursuant to Family Court Act § 749 (b) and thus the petition should be dismissed. Because the Law Guardian did not move to dismiss the petition on that ground, that right was waived (see, Matter of Harry J., 191 AD2d 1016, 1017). (Appeal from Order of Wayne County Family Court, Kehoe, J. — Person In Need Of Supervision.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Salvatore A.M.
2017 NY Slip Op 7876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
T., HALEY M., MTR. OF
96 A.D.3d 1549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re of Sarah G.
11 A.D.3d 976 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Dean D.
303 A.D.2d 1034 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 939, 718 N.Y.S.2d 677, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shannon-r-nyappdiv-2000.