in Re Shane Cain
This text of in Re Shane Cain (in Re Shane Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00763-CR
IN RE Shane CAIN
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 5, 2014
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On October 30, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining that
the 1992 judgment of conviction in his criminal case is void. The court has considered relator’s
petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the
petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 91-0984-CR, styled The State of Texas v. Shane McClaine Cain, pending in the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable W.C. Kirkendall presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Shane Cain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shane-cain-texapp-2014.