in Re Shane Cain

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 29, 2000
Docket04-00-00148-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Shane Cain (in Re Shane Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Shane Cain, (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

00-00148 In re Cain.wpd
No. 04-00-00148-CV
In re SHANE CAIN
From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas
Trial Court No. 91-0984-CR
Honorable Dwight E. Peshel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 29, 2000

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Relator, Shane Cain, has submitted a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to take certain actions. We dismiss the petition lack of jurisdiction.

This court's authority to issue original writs of mandamus is limited. The court may execute such extraordinary relief only when necessary to enforce its jurisdiction or to correct acts of a district judge, county court judge, or district judge acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry. Tex. Gov't. Code Ann. § 22.221(a) & (b) (Vernon Supp. 2000). This mandamus proceeding is not one to enforce our jurisdiction, no appellate jurisdiction having been invoked, nor is it directed against a

district or county judge. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus because we lack the jurisdiction to consider it.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.221
Texas GV § 22.221(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Shane Cain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shane-cain-texapp-2000.