in Re Shane Cain
This text of in Re Shane Cain (in Re Shane Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 29, 2000
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
Relator, Shane Cain, has submitted a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to take certain actions. We dismiss the petition lack of jurisdiction.
This court's authority to issue original writs of mandamus is limited. The court may execute such extraordinary relief only when necessary to enforce its jurisdiction or to correct acts of a district judge, county court judge, or district judge acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry. Tex. Gov't. Code Ann. § 22.221(a) & (b) (Vernon Supp. 2000). This mandamus proceeding is not one to enforce our jurisdiction, no appellate jurisdiction having been invoked, nor is it directed against a
district or county judge. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus because we lack the jurisdiction to consider it.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Shane Cain, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shane-cain-texapp-2000.