In re Shalleck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shalleck

205 A.D.2d 34, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9767

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 34 (In re Shalleck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shalleck, 205 A.D.2d 34, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9767 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law at this Department in 1941, and has maintained a practice within this Department at all times relevant to these proceedings.

[35]*35A cofounder of the New York Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, respondent recently served as treasurer of the Chapter. Over a period of time, while serving in that capacity, he made unauthorized withdrawals from the organization’s bank account, amounting to about $34,000, which he used for personal purposes. When confronted with a record of these transactions, respondent admitted his indiscretion, cooperated with an audit, made what he believes to have been full restitution, and resigned from the Academy. He has also cooperated with petitioner’s investigation into these allegations of professional misconduct.

Respondent has submitted an affidavit of resignation from the Bar, pursuant to section 603.11 of the Rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 603.11), in which he admits in detail the allegations of the present investigation, and acknowledges that if formal charges were to be lodged, he would be unable to defend himself successfully on the merits. Full of remorse and aware of the implications of submitting his resignation, the 77-year-old respondent states nonetheless that his request is rendered freely and voluntarily, without coercion or duress.

Petitioner recommends our acceptance of respondent’s resignation. Accordingly, respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice law, effective immediately.

Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Asch and Tom, JJ., concur.

Motion granted and respondent’s resignation accepted, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law at this Department in 1941, and has maintained a practice within this Department at all times relevant to these proceedings.

[35]*35A cofounder of the New York Chapter of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, respondent recently served as treasurer of the Chapter. Over a period of time, while serving in that capacity, he made unauthorized withdrawals from the organization’s bank account, amounting to about $34,000, which he used for personal purposes. When confronted with a record of these transactions, respondent admitted his indiscretion, cooperated with an audit, made what he believes to have been full restitution, and resigned from the Academy. He has also cooperated with petitioner’s investigation into these allegations of professional misconduct.

Respondent has submitted an affidavit of resignation from the Bar, pursuant to section 603.11 of the Rules of this Court (22 NYCRR 603.11), in which he admits in detail the allegations of the present investigation, and acknowledges that if formal charges were to be lodged, he would be unable to defend himself successfully on the merits. Full of remorse and aware of the implications of submitting his resignation, the 77-year-old respondent states nonetheless that his request is rendered freely and voluntarily, without coercion or duress.

Petitioner recommends our acceptance of respondent’s resignation. Accordingly, respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice law, effective immediately.

Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Asch and Tom, JJ., concur.

Motion granted and respondent’s resignation accepted, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 34, 618 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shalleck-nyappdiv-1994.