In re Shakirrah C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shakirrah C.

66 A.D.3d 1492, 885 N.Y.S.2d 656

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 66 A.D.3d 1492 (In re Shakirrah C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shakirrah C., 66 A.D.3d 1492, 885 N.Y.S.2d 656 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joseph G. Nesser, J.), entered June 16, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The order adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent and placed respondent on probation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating her to be a juvenile delinquent based on the finding that she committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30). Contrary to respondent’s contention, “the evidence presented at the hearing, when viewed in the light most favorable to the presentment agency . . . , is legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that respondent committed the acts alleged in the petition” (Matter of Aron B., 46 AD3d 1431, 1431 [2007] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey Garni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joseph G. Nesser, J.), entered June 16, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The order adjudged that respondent is a juvenile delinquent and placed respondent on probation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating her to be a juvenile delinquent based on the finding that she committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of resisting arrest (Penal Law § 205.30). Contrary to respondent’s contention, “the evidence presented at the hearing, when viewed in the light most favorable to the presentment agency . . . , is legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that respondent committed the acts alleged in the petition” (Matter of Aron B., 46 AD3d 1431, 1431 [2007] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey Garni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.3d 1492, 885 N.Y.S.2d 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shakirrah-c-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack