In re Shakima S.
This text of 60 A.D.3d 955 (In re Shakima S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Shaun S. appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), dated September 18, 2007, as relieved his attorney from representing him, based upon his failure to appear in the matter for more than six months.
[956]*956Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
This appeal has been rendered academic inasmuch as, subsequent to the court’s order relieving counsel, the matter proceeded to a dispositional hearing, an order of disposition was entered, and the father is not appealing from that order of disposition. Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.D.3d 955, 874 N.Y.S.2d 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shakima-s-nyappdiv-2009.