In re Shaikh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shaikh

48 A.D.2d 738, 367 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9813

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 738 (In re Shaikh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shaikh, 48 A.D.2d 738, 367 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Application, pursuant to CPLR 9405, for written consent to the renewal of petitioner’s application for admission to practice without examination. Following the determination of the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Sixth Judicial District that it was unable to recommend or certify petitioner as one possessed of the legal training and ability necessary for admission to the Bar without examination, we denied petitioner’s application to overrule the committee’s decision and for an order admitting him to practice without examination by decision dated March 3, 1975. Thereafter, by decision dated April 18, 1975, we denied petitioner’s request to refer his application for admission without examination to the committee for reconsideration. Inasmuch as the question of petitioner’s fitness has been considered twice within the past two months, this application should be denied as premature. Application denied. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application, pursuant to CPLR 9405, for written consent to the renewal of petitioner’s application for admission to practice without examination. Following the determination of the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Sixth Judicial District that it was unable to recommend or certify petitioner as one possessed of the legal training and ability necessary for admission to the Bar without examination, we denied petitioner’s application to overrule the committee’s decision and for an order admitting him to practice without examination by decision dated March 3, 1975. Thereafter, by decision dated April 18, 1975, we denied petitioner’s request to refer his application for admission without examination to the committee for reconsideration. Inasmuch as the question of petitioner’s fitness has been considered twice within the past two months, this application should be denied as premature. Application denied. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 738, 367 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shaikh-nyappdiv-1975.