In re Shah

Fourth Circuit

In re Shah

676 F. App'x 221

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2017·No. No. 16-2171·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma paupéris, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant Shah’s motion to withdraw his amended petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma paupéris, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant Shah’s motion to withdraw his amended petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

In re Shah, 676 F. App'x 221 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

676 F. App'x 221 (In re Shah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related