In re Shadazia W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Shadazia W.

48 A.D.3d 1058, 849 N.Y.S.2d 827

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 2008

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 48 A.D.3d 1058 (In re Shadazia W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Shadazia W., 48 A.D.3d 1058, 849 N.Y.S.2d 827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Michael L. Hanuszczak, J.), entered December 20, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, insofar as appealed from, terminated the parental rights of respondent Teneya C.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order adjudicating her three children to be permanently neglected and terminating her parental rights, respondent mother contends that Family Court erred in failing to issue a suspended judgment. That contention is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as the mother failed to request a suspended judgment (see Matter of Bryce R.W., 32 AD3d 1312 [2006]; Matter of Rosalinda R., 16 AD3d 1063 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]). Present&emdash;Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Michael L. Hanuszczak, J.), entered December 20, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, insofar as appealed from, terminated the parental rights of respondent Teneya C.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order adjudicating her three children to be permanently neglected and terminating her parental rights, respondent mother contends that Family Court erred in failing to issue a suspended judgment. That contention is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as the mother failed to request a suspended judgment (see Matter of Bryce R.W., 32 AD3d 1312 [2006]; Matter of Rosalinda R., 16 AD3d 1063 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]). Present&emdash;Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.3d 1058, 849 N.Y.S.2d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-shadazia-w-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack