In Re Severin
205 P. 101, 56 Cal. App. 637, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 508
Opinion
[1] After an examination of the entire record we are satisfied that the corpus delicti has been sufficiently established by circumstantial evidence to permit the admission in evidence of the extrajudicial statements and admissions of the petitioner.
*Page 638The application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Severin, 205 P. 101, 56 Cal. App. 637, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 508 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).
205 P. 101 (In Re Severin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Sobiek
30 Cal. App. 3d 458 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
People v. Jones
224 P.2d 353 (California Supreme Court, 1950)
People v. Brody
83 P.2d 952 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
In Re Moore
233 P. 805 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)