In re Settle

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Settle

160 So. 3d 582, 2015 La. LEXIS 343, 2015 WL 1085910

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 6, 2015·No. No. 2014-B-2606·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he disrupted the courts of two judges and compromised the confidentiality of a Judiciary Commission investigation. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that [583] John E. Settle, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll' number 11950, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) submitted a joint petition for consent discipline in which respondent acknowledges that he disrupted the courts of two judges and compromised the confidentiality of a Judiciary Commission investigation. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that [583] John E. Settle, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll' number 11950, be and he hereby is publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Settle, 160 So. 3d 582, 2015 La. LEXIS 343, 2015 WL 1085910 (La. 2015).

Pincite

160 So. 3d 582 (In re Settle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.