in Re: S.E.T.H. and R.M.R.H., Children

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2018
Docket12-17-00358-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: S.E.T.H. and R.M.R.H., Children (in Re: S.E.T.H. and R.M.R.H., Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: S.E.T.H. and R.M.R.H., Children, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NO. 12-17-00358-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: §

S.E.T.H. AND R.M.R.H., § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

CHILDREN §

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM M.H. filed an original proceeding in which she challenged Respondent’s jurisdiction to issue a temporary order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. On February 6, 2018, this Court conditionally granted M.H.’s petition and directed Respondent to vacate his November 8, 2017 temporary restraining order and order for a show cause hearing. By an order signed on February 9, 2018, Respondent has complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding moot. Accordingly, we dismiss M.H.’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Opinion delivered February 14, 2018. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 14, 2018

NO. 12-17-00358-CV

M.H., Relator V.

HON. B. JEFF DORAN, Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by M.H.; who is the relator in Cause No. CCL-17-15607, pending on the docket of the County Court at Law of Anderson County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on November 15, 2017, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed as moot. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: S.E.T.H. and R.M.R.H., Children, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-seth-and-rmrh-children-texapp-2018.