In re Service

83 N.E.3d 73, 2017 WL 2376757, 2017 Ind. LEXIS 435
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 2017
DocketSupreme Court Case No. 49S00-1703-DI-144
StatusPublished

This text of 83 N.E.3d 73 (In re Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Service, 83 N.E.3d 73, 2017 WL 2376757, 2017 Ind. LEXIS 435 (Ind. 2017).

Opinion

Published Order Suspending Respondent from the Practice of Law in Indiana for Noncooperation

On March 15, 2017, this Court ordered Respondent to show cause why Respondent should not be immediately suspended from the practice of law in this state for failure to cooperate with the Commission’s investigation of a grievance, No. 17-0800, filed against Respondent. The order required that Respondent show cause in writing within ten days of service of the order. Respondent filed a response on April 2, 2017. On April 27, 2017, the Commission filed a “Request for Ruling and to Tax Costs” asserting that Respondent still has not cooperated, to which Respondent has not responded.

Finding Respondent’s response to this Court’s show cause order inadequate and being duly advised, the Court ORDERS that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law for noncooperation with the Commission, effective immediately. Pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10.1)(c)(3), this suspension shall continue until the Executive Director of the Disciplinary Commission certifies to the Court that Respondent has cooperated fully with the investigation or until further order of this Court, provided there are no other suspensions then in effect.

Respondent is already under a suspension for continuing legal education noncompliance. Respondent is ordered to fulfill the continuing duties of a suspended attorney under Admission and Discipline Rule 23(26).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23(10.1)(d), that Respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Commission $513.12 for the costs of prosecuting this proceeding.

All Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 N.E.3d 73, 2017 WL 2376757, 2017 Ind. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-service-ind-2017.