In Re Serrano

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Serrano

224 S.W.3d 225, 2005 WL 387260

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 27, 2005·No. 08-05-00065-CV·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Relators, Rosa Serrano and Julian Serrano, asks this Court to issue a writ of *226 mandamus against the Honorable William E. Moody, Judge of the 34th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Respondent clearly abused his discretion or that Relators have no other adequate remedy. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Relators, Rosa Serrano and Julian Serrano, asks this Court to issue a writ of *226 mandamus against the Honorable William E. Moody, Judge of the 34th District Court of El Paso County. Mandamus will lie only to correct a clear abuse of discretion. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex.1992)(orig. proceeding). Moreover, there must be no other adequate remedy at law. Id. Based on the record before us, we are unable to conclude that Respondent clearly abused his discretion or that Relators have no other adequate remedy. Accordingly, we deny mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

In Re Serrano, 224 S.W.3d 225, 2005 WL 387260 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

224 S.W.3d 225 (In Re Serrano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related