In re Serenity Celene M.

93 A.D.3d 448, 939 N.Y.S.2d 697
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 8, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 93 A.D.3d 448 (In re Serenity Celene M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Serenity Celene M., 93 A.D.3d 448, 939 N.Y.S.2d 697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Appeal from order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Fernando Silva, J.), entered on or about June 3, 2011, which, among other things, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent father’s parental rights to the subject child and committed the child’s custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs, and the motion to relieve assigned counsel granted.

Upon our review of respondent’s assigned counsel’s motion and the record, we agree that the subject order is nonappealable since it was entered following respondent’s default at both the fact-finding and dispositional hearings (Matter of Zoraida Marie C., 66 AD3d 486 [2009]). In any event, there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal (id.; Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ernie Luis T.
100 A.D.3d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.D.3d 448, 939 N.Y.S.2d 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-serenity-celene-m-nyappdiv-2012.