in Re: Senrick Wilkerson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 28, 2015·No. 05-15-01271-CV·Published

Opinion

DENIED and Opinion Filed October 28, 2015.

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01271-CV

IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-00716

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Justice Stoddart Before the Court is relator’s letter dated October 14, 2015 in which he requests that the

Court order the trial court to issue a bench warrant to transport the relator to Dallas County so

that he can prepare for the trial of his civil case. We treat relator’s letter as a petition for writ of

mandamus. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court

has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re

Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the

record before the Court, we cannot conclude the trial court has abused its discretion. We deny

the relief relator requests.

/Craig Stoddart/ 151271F.P05 CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Senrick Wilkerson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

in Re: Senrick Wilkerson (in Re: Senrick Wilkerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)