In re Seneca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Seneca

249 A.D. 921, 292 N.Y.S. 784, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10153

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 6, 1937·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted vacating the injunction and dismissing the proceeding, without costs, on the ground that the provisions of section 333 of the Election Law, under which this proceeding was brought, have no application to an Indian election held pursuant to section 42 of the Indian Law. All concur. (The order denies motion to vacate an injunction and for other relief.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted vacating the injunction and dismissing the proceeding, without costs, on the ground that the provisions of section 333 of the Election Law, under which this proceeding was brought, have no application to an Indian election held pursuant to section 42 of the Indian Law. All concur. (The order denies motion to vacate an injunction and for other relief.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

In re Seneca, 249 A.D. 921, 292 N.Y.S. 784, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

249 A.D. 921 (In re Seneca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.