In re Semons

Second Circuit

In re Semons

140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3646

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1906

DocketNo. 110

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 F. 989 (In re Semons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Semons, 140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3646 (2d Cir. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The bankrupt did not appeal from the order dismissing-his application for discharge. Such an order we held in Re Kuffler, 127 Fed. 125, 61 C. C. A. 259, was in substance an order denying discharge, and as such reviewable by appeal under Bankr. Act July‘1, 1898, c. 541, § 25, 30 Stat. 553 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432]. Having elected not to review such order by appeal, he should not be allowed to Question its validity as an order denying discharge. Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The bankrupt did not appeal from the order dismissing-his application for discharge. Such an order we held in Re Kuffler, 127 Fed. 125, 61 C. C. A. 259, was in substance an order denying discharge, and as such reviewable by appeal under Bankr. Act July‘1, 1898, c. 541, § 25, 30 Stat. 553 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3432]. Having elected not to review such order by appeal, he should not be allowed to Question its validity as an order denying discharge. Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 F. 989, 72 C.C.A. 683, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-semons-ca2-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack