In re Semken
This text of 35 N.Y.S. 471 (In re Semken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the absence of some statutory provision to such an effect, the city court of Hew York is without jurisdiction to grant a writ of certiorari to review an adverse determination of the board of excise in the city of New York upon an application for a license. People v. Board of Excise of City of New York, 3 N. Y. St. Rep. 253. Assuming that the city court of New York is a “city court,” within the meaning of section 1 of chapter 481 of the Laws of 1893, still jurisdiction to grant the writ is not apparent. The statute alluded to provides that a writ of certiorari “may be made returnable to and the cause heard by a city court,” etc., but nowhere empowers the city court to grant or issue the writ. Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 N.Y.S. 471, 13 Misc. 488, 70 N.Y. St. Rep. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-semken-nyctcompl-1895.