In re Sellers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

In re Sellers

545 S.E.2d 385, 247 Ga. App. 811

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 5, 2001

DocketA00A1894

StatusPublished

This text of 545 S.E.2d 385 (In re Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sellers, 545 S.E.2d 385, 247 Ga. App. 811 (Ga. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

The petitioner, Joseph Sellers, husband and guardian of Sonja Smith Sellers, filed with the probate court a “PETITION TO COMPROMISE DOUBTFUL CLAIM OF INCAPACITATED ADULT AND MOTION TO APPROVE TRUST.” Sonja Sellers suffered a closed head injury in an automobile accident and is incapacitated. The probate court, pursuant to OCGA § 29-2-16 (b), authorized the petitioner to consummate a settlement on behalf of Mrs. Sellers of all claims as a result of the accident. The court further ruled that it was without authority to allow Mr. Sellers as guardian to create a trust intended for the settlement proceeds and denied the petitioner’s motion. The petitioner appeals this denial.

OCGA § 29-2-16 (b) states that a court-approved compromise “may involve a structured settlement or creation of a trust on such terms as the court approves” (Emphasis supplied.) Therefore, the probate court had the authority to approve the creation of the trust by the guardian and erred in denying the petitioner’s motion on that ground.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Pope, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller, Judge.

The petitioner, Joseph Sellers, husband and guardian of Sonja Smith Sellers, filed with the probate court a “PETITION TO COMPROMISE DOUBTFUL CLAIM OF INCAPACITATED ADULT AND MOTION TO APPROVE TRUST.” Sonja Sellers suffered a closed head injury in an automobile accident and is incapacitated. The probate court, pursuant to OCGA § 29-2-16 (b), authorized the petitioner to consummate a settlement on behalf of Mrs. Sellers of all claims as a result of the accident. The court further ruled that it was without authority to allow Mr. Sellers as guardian to create a trust intended for the settlement proceeds and denied the petitioner’s motion. The petitioner appeals this denial.

OCGA § 29-2-16 (b) states that a court-approved compromise “may involve a structured settlement or creation of a trust on such terms as the court approves” (Emphasis supplied.) Therefore, the probate court had the authority to approve the creation of the trust by the guardian and erred in denying the petitioner’s motion on that ground.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Pope, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

545 S.E.2d 385, 247 Ga. App. 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sellers-gactapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack