In Re Seitz

430 B.R. 761, 63 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1348, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1144, 2010 WL 1409655
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas
DecidedApril 8, 2010
Docket19-30529
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 430 B.R. 761 (In Re Seitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Seitz, 430 B.R. 761, 63 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1348, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1144, 2010 WL 1409655 (Tex. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON GANEL BEADLE SEITZ’ MOTION FOR EXECUTOR TO APPEAR ON BEHALF OF DEBTOR

HARLIN DeWAYNE HALE, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue before the court is whether Bankruptcy law allows a joint-debtor *762 spouse, who is also acting as personal administrator for her husband’s estate, to appear at the § 341 Meeting. This court holds that Ganel Beadle Seitz is allowed to attend the § 341 Meeting, as both a debtor and a personal representative of her husband’s estate.

Facts

Joint-debtors Nicholas Harrison Seitz, Jr. and Ganel Beadle Seitz, husband and wife, filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in Wichita Falls, Texas, on October 20, 2009. The husband passed away November 11, 2009, before the Section 341 meeting of creditors (“§ 341 Meeting”). Ganel Beadle Seitz is the executrix for her husband’s estate and has been authorized as its “personal representative” with Letters Testamentary from the Wichita County Court of Law.

Ms. Seitz filed a Motion for Executor to Appear on Behalf of Debtor in which she requested that she be allowed to testify at the § 341 Meeting on her deceased husband’s behalf as Executor. The Trustee, Walker O’Cheskey, filed a Response to the her motion in which he neither admitted nor denied her request to testify.

The Relevant Bankruptcy and Texas Law

Section 343 and Rule 1016

Under 11 U.S.C. § 343, 1 a debtor is required to appear under oath at the § 341 Meeting. The § 341 Meeting gives the creditors and the trustee the opportunity to examine the debtor. However, if the debtor dies before the § 341 Meeting, Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1016 2 gives the bankruptcy court discretion to 1) dismiss or 2) continue a bankruptcy case as if the death had never occurred.

Personal Representative

In Texas, the “personal representative” of the debtor’s estate is either the “executor” if named in the will or the “administrator” if the person dies intestate. Tex. Prob.Code §§ 3(aa) and 178(a-b). 3 The personal representative is not authorized to act on behalf of the deceased debtor until Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration are issued by the courts. Duncan v. Veal, 49 Tex. 603 (1878); Neel v. Maurice, 223 S.W.2d 690, 693 (Tex. Civ. App.-El Paso 1941); and Tex. Jur. Decedents Estates § 257.

*763 In Texas, only the personal representative may appear on the deceased debtor’s behalf in a judicial proceeding. Tex. PROB.Code §§ 233(a), 4 -37 5 ; Krishnan v. Ramirez, 42 S.W.3d 205 (Tex.App.Corpus Christi 2001, pet. denied) (generally the personal representative of a decedent’s estate is the only person entitled to sue to recover estate property, although an exception exists, and heirs at law can maintain a survival suit within the period allowed by law if they allege and prove there is no administration pending and none necessary); and Catlett v. Catlett, 630 S.W.2d 478 (Tex.App.1982, writ ref. n.r.e.) (when a personal representative of estate deems it to be in the estate’s best interest, he may compromise or settle estate’s litigation upon making written application to the probate court and obtaining an order granting such authority).

Few cases discuss the issue of whether the spouse of the deceased joint-debtor may appear on behalf of the deceased debtor. Bankruptcy courts in Texas have held that the personal representative is the person authorized to appear on behalf of the “debtor” at the § 341 Meeting. In addition, the personal representative’s appearance and testimony satisfy the § 343 requirement that the debtor be present at the § 341 Meeting. In re Hamilton, 274 B.R. 266, 267 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.2001); In re Lucio, 251 B.R. 705, 709 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.2000).

The debtor in In re Lucio passed away after filing for Chapter 7 but before attending the § 341 Meeting. In re Lucio, 251 B.R. at 707. The debtor’s daughter had the debtor’s power of attorney and had extensive personal knowledge of the debtor’s financial affairs. The daughter requested to appear at the § 341 Meeting on the debtor’s behalf; however, the bankruptcy court refused. Id. The court’s rationale was that the daughter’s power of attorney expired upon the debtor’s death and only the debtor’s estate’s personal representative could appear on behalf of the debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 343. Id. at 708. Instead, the court held that only the decedent’s estate’s personal representative could attend the § 341 Meeting. Id. at 709.

Similarly, in In re Hamilton, the court held that the only person who could attend *764 the § 341 Meeting when a debtor dies is the debtor’s estate’s personal representative. Hamilton, 274 B.R. at 267. Like the instant ease, the debtor passed away after filing for bankruptcy but before attending the § 341 Meeting. Id. The debtor’s wife petitioned to appear at her deceased husband’s § 341 Meeting. However, she did not present facts that she was her the personal representative of his estate, nor that she had been given Letters Testamentary. Therefore, the court denied the wife’s request to appear at the § 341 Meeting. Id. at 268.

This Case

In the instant case, the Ms. Seitz appears to have met the legal requirements set out under Texas law for her to represent her deceased husband in a judicial proceeding. She has presented evidence to this court that the Texas Courts have appointed her as the estate’s personal representative and issued her Letters Testamentary. Therefore, 11 U.S.C. § 343 is satisfied because the debtor’s personal representative will be present at the § 341 Meeting to answer questions about the estate. Thus, Ganel Beadle Seitz is authorized to speak on behalf of her husband’s estate at the § 341 Meeting.

Accordingly, Ganel Beadle Seitz may testify at the § 341 Meeting on her own behalf and as personal administrator of her husband’s estate. Pursuant to the power given under Fed. R. Bankr.P. 1016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kevin N. Russell
W.D. Kentucky, 2024
Dan LaVell Meadows
D. Utah, 2020
Dukes v. Strand
N.D. Texas, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 B.R. 761, 63 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1348, 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1144, 2010 WL 1409655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-seitz-txnb-2010.