In re Seifert

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Seifert

92 A.3d 1140, 2014 WL 2608487

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2014·No. No. 14-BG-323·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of North Carolina, this court’s April 3, 2014, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent failed to respond to the court’s order but did file his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Mark K. Seifert is hereby disbarred from the practice of law [1141] in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to April 3, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of North Carolina, this court’s April 3, 2014, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent failed to respond to the court’s order but did file his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Mark K. Seifert is hereby disbarred from the practice of law [1141] in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to April 3, 2014.

In re Seifert, 92 A.3d 1140, 2014 WL 2608487 (D.C. 2014).

Pincite

92 A.3d 1140 (In re Seifert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.