In re Seguin

120 A.3d 87, 2015 WL 4486687
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided July 23, 2015·No. No. 15-BG-457·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of New Jersey by consent, this court’s May 27, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause he should not be disbarred as reciprocal discipline, and the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Robert Seguin is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C.Bar. R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Seguin, 120 A.3d 87, 2015 WL 4486687 (D.C. 2015).

120 A.3d 87 (In re Seguin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)