In re Segal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Segal

235 A.D.2d 327, 653 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 957

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1997·Published

Opinion

The Hearing Panel’s findings of fact and conclu[328]*328sions of law are confirmed and the motion for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York is granted to the extent of directing that petitioner shall be reinstated on condition that he submit proof to this Court of having obtained malpractice insurance within 60 days of the date hereof, and upon the further order of this Court. No opinion. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Hearing Panel’s findings of fact and conclu[328]*328sions of law are confirmed and the motion for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York is granted to the extent of directing that petitioner shall be reinstated on condition that he submit proof to this Court of having obtained malpractice insurance within 60 days of the date hereof, and upon the further order of this Court. No opinion. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Williams and Tom, JJ.

In re Segal, 235 A.D.2d 327, 653 N.Y.S.2d 848, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

235 A.D.2d 327 (In re Segal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.