In re Segal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Segal

26 A.D.2d 591, 272 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 591 (In re Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Segal, 26 A.D.2d 591, 272 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Pursuant to statute Code Crim. Pro., § 485-b) the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, has transmitted to this court his certificate, dated June 1, 1966, which states that the above-named Sam S. Segal (who was admitted to practice by this court on June 28, 1933) was found guilty of taking of unlawful fees and attempted grand larceny in the second degree by the Supreme Court, New York County, after a non jury trial, and that on May 23, 1966 sentence was [592]*592suspended (without probation) on each conviction, by said court. Accordingly, by virtue of subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, said Sam S. Segal has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or competent to practice law as such. On this court’s own motion, an order will be entered directing that the name of said Sam S. Segal be struck from the roll of attorneys. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to statute Code Crim. Pro., § 485-b) the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, has transmitted to this court his certificate, dated June 1, 1966, which states that the above-named Sam S. Segal (who was admitted to practice by this court on June 28, 1933) was found guilty of taking of unlawful fees and attempted grand larceny in the second degree by the Supreme Court, New York County, after a non jury trial, and that on May 23, 1966 sentence was [592]*592suspended (without probation) on each conviction, by said court. Accordingly, by virtue of subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, said Sam S. Segal has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or competent to practice law as such. On this court’s own motion, an order will be entered directing that the name of said Sam S. Segal be struck from the roll of attorneys. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 591, 272 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-segal-nyappdiv-1966.