In re Segal

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Segal

623 A.2d 769, 132 N.J. 154, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 88

DecidedApril 29, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 623 A.2d 769 (In re Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Segal, 623 A.2d 769, 132 N.J. 154, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 88 (N.J. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MATTHEW E. SEGAL of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to keep clients reasonably informed about the status of the matter and failure to comply with requests for information), in his handling of a series of collections matters for a single client and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with the ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

[155]*155It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and MATTHEW E. SEGAL is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MATTHEW E. SEGAL of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, be publicly reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to keep clients reasonably informed about the status of the matter and failure to comply with requests for information), in his handling of a series of collections matters for a single client and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with the ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;

[155]*155It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and MATTHEW E. SEGAL is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 A.2d 769, 132 N.J. 154, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-segal-nj-1993.