In re Seffern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Seffern

131 A.D.2d 384, 516 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47863

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 25, 1987·Published

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of reinstating respondent as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York upon confirmation of (1) respondent’s having made payment of restitution, as indicated in the order of this court, and (2) respondent’s successful completion of a recognized Bar review course, and upon the further order of this court. Concur— Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Asch and Milonas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of reinstating respondent as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York upon confirmation of (1) respondent’s having made payment of restitution, as indicated in the order of this court, and (2) respondent’s successful completion of a recognized Bar review course, and upon the further order of this court. Concur— Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Carro, Asch and Milonas, JJ.

In re Seffern, 131 A.D.2d 384, 516 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

131 A.D.2d 384 (In re Seffern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.