In re Seebeck's Estate
This text of 21 N.Y.S. 1123 (In re Seebeck's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question here sought to be raised as to the construction of the ninteenth clause of will of John H. Seebeck, deceased, as modified by the third clause of the codicil thereto, has been decided by this general term, and must be regarded conclusive until overruled or modified by the court of appeals.
As to the second question, whether the share of the income due Henry M. Tienken at his death shall be charged with its proportionate share of the taxes on the realty, we think the decision of the surrogate is right. See In re Babcock, 115 N. Y. 450, 22 N. E. Rep. 263, and cases there cited. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-seebecks-estate-nysupct-1892.