In re Sedor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Sedor

901 A.2d 979

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 5, 2006

DocketNo. 1116 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 979 (In re Sedor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sedor, 901 A.2d 979 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2006, a Rule having been entered by this Court on March 3, 2006, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael Sedor to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Michael Sedor is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2006, a Rule having been entered by this Court on March 3, 2006, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing Michael Sedor to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; Michael Sedor is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 214(d)(2), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 A.2d 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sedor-pa-2006.