In re Sederlund

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Sederlund

106 N.J. 651, 1987 N.J. LEXIS 1866

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 12, 1987·Published

Opinion

ELAINE SEDERLUND of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, having tendered her consent to a disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ELAINE SEDERLUND of JERSEY CITY is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that she be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to comply with Administrative Guideline No. 28 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended and disbarred attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ELAINE SEDERLUND of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, having tendered her consent to a disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ELAINE SEDERLUND of JERSEY CITY is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that she be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to comply with Administrative Guideline No. 28 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended and disbarred attorneys.

In re Sederlund, 106 N.J. 651, 1987 N.J. LEXIS 1866 (N.J. 1987).

Pincite

106 N.J. 651 (In re Sederlund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.