In re Second Avenue Roumanian Kretchma, Inc.

285 A.D. 877, 137 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The appointment of a receiver in this matter was improvident and there is no need for a reference (see Matter of 3260 Perry Ave. Realty Corp. [De Burr], 285 App. Div. 71). It would seem that the dispute between the parties relates mainly if not entirely to the price at which respondent should acquire petitioner’s interest in the business. The agreement between them contemplated how this price should be determined. It would seem that by pursuing the mechanics contemplated in the agreement or otherwise, the parties should be able to resolve their difference in this regard. If it is necessary, however, to press the application for dissolution of the corporation, it may appropriately be determined by the court without a reference. The order appealed from is reversed and the matter remitted to Special Term, with costs to appellant. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Second Avenue Roumanian Kretchma, Inc., 285 A.D. 877, 137 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

285 A.D. 877 (In re Second Avenue Roumanian Kretchma, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Dissolution of Whitehall Art Co.
6 A.D.2d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)