In re Sebastian M.

64 A.D.3d 401, 881 N.Y.S.2d 297
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 2, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 A.D.3d 401 (In re Sebastian M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Sebastian M., 64 A.D.3d 401, 881 N.Y.S.2d 297 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about July 19, 2007, which, upon a finding of mental illness, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject children, and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding that respondent was mentally ill and is, by reason of such illness, presently and for the foreseeable future, unable to properly and adequately care for the subject children, was supported by clear and convincing evidence, including medical records and expert testimony (see Matter of Mitchell Randell K. , 41 AD3d 119 [2007]; Matter of Nadaniel Jackie P, 35 AD3d 305 [2006]; Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [a]). Contrary to respondent’s argument, the court provided her with ample opportunity to counter the expert testimony as to her mental illness and to establish that she was complying with the requisite treatment, and did not commit error in sustaining objections to irrelevant questions pertaining to whether the agency referred respondent to her current therapist or whether she sought out the therapist on her own accord. Concur— Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Savannah Love Joy F.
110 A.D.3d 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Jada S.
86 A.D.3d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.D.3d 401, 881 N.Y.S.2d 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sebastian-m-nyappdiv-2009.