In re Sean X.
473 N.E.2d 40, 63 N.Y.2d 943, 483 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4726
This text of 473 N.E.2d 40 (In re Sean X.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Sean X., 473 N.E.2d 40, 63 N.Y.2d 943, 483 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4726 (N.Y. 1984).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal, etc., denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Whelan v Griffin, 63 NY2d 650).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
Whelan v. Griffin
468 N.E.2d 704 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
473 N.E.2d 40, 63 N.Y.2d 943, 483 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sean-x-ny-1984.