In re Sean T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Sean T.

224 A.D.2d 341, 638 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1454

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 341 (In re Sean T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Sean T., 224 A.D.2d 341, 638 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1454 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered January 27, 1995, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and menacing in the second degree, and placed him on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of intent to cause serious physical injury is readily inferable from the viciousness of the attack (see, People v Truesdale, 186 AD2d 496, lv denied 81 NY2d 766), and was neither legally unsupported nor against the weight of the evidence. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Stewart Weinstein, J.), entered January 27, 1995, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and menacing in the second degree, and placed him on probation for two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of intent to cause serious physical injury is readily inferable from the viciousness of the attack (see, People v Truesdale, 186 AD2d 496, lv denied 81 NY2d 766), and was neither legally unsupported nor against the weight of the evidence. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 341, 638 N.Y.S.2d 310, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sean-t-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack