In Re Sean McNamara v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Sean McNamara v. the State of Texas (In Re Sean McNamara v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00500-CR
IN RE Sean MCNAMARA
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 1, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; EMERGENCY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF DISMISSED AS MOOT
Relator, Sean McNamara, filed his petition for writ of mandamus, emergency motion for
temporary relief, and mandamus record on June 24, 2026. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy,
available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused its discretion or violated
a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal. Walker v.
Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Having considered the petition,
the motion, and the record provided, this court concludes that McNamara has not shown that he is
entitled to the relief sought. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is
denied. The emergency motion for temporary relief is dismissed as moot.
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of a filing tendered for docketing in Medina County Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Sean McNamara v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-sean-mcnamara-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.